Tend to see the utility of movement pursuing only the achievement targetsĬost and benefit in a more rationality. But also on that others side, the study of social resistance movements more emphasis on movement collectivity in a formal form of mass organization and Just be aware that in this work, the study of social resistance theoretically sometimes affected structural strain paradigm (structural strain perspectives) in terms of more unit of analysis to the tension of the structures of the mobilizing political actors mass extensively due to derivation factors. The purpose of this paper is also essentially aim only mapped back the theoretical system of the study of social resistance who have gained tremendous influence in history and the development of resistance studies to the present day. By shifting attentions to issue-specific cooperation, this book attempts to fully grasp the dynamics of 50 years of ASEAN cooperation.The social movement paradigm has been influence on the study of social resistance,ĭeserves to be welcomed as a capable scientific work presenting and unraveling the theoretical tangle of resistance studies social intended. The way issue-specific cooperation alters ASEAN architectures also remains understudied. Emphasis on static, traditional, and all-encompassing identity has made issue-specific cooperation and its internal dynamics neglected. However, this approach suffers from limitations. Scholars of ASEAN regionalism tend to use ASEAN identity as the main explanation of cooperation among ASEAN member states. Yet, in the midst of ASEAN uncertain future trajectories, there is only limited consensus on how to approach ASEAN regionalism. Despite of its widely acknowledged status as one of the most successful regionalism, ASEAN still suffers from numerous obstacles. This book intends to offer an alternative lens for regionalism studies in Southeast Asia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |